RECRUITMENT
Recruitment.Made disciplined.
Great scouting does not save a weak process. Recruitment needs constraints, ownership and timing.
We take your current approach — lists, opinions, budgets — and upgrade it into a window system that protects decision quality.
Request access
Coherent windows. No panic signings.
Process beats urgency.
Input
Your squad picture, scouting outputs, constraints, budget, timelines.
Upgrade
Profile logic, shortlists with evidence, mandate rules, risk thresholds.
Output
A window plan: roles, priorities, trade-offs, and decision rhythm.
RECRUITMENT PLAN
Club: Example FC
SUMMER WINDOW
Cycle: 2026–2029 · v0.9
01
Squad Thesis
Build positional depth for the playing model. Prioritise decision reliability over highlight potential. Every signing must strengthen the squad architecture — not just the XI.
02
Priority Roles (Top 3)
1) Left 8 · 2) Right CB · 3) Wide forward
Each role has an agreed profile, budget band, and fallback plan.
Each role has an agreed profile, budget band, and fallback plan.
03
Profile Constraints
Model fit overrides reputation. Age curve aligns to cycle. Injury risk assessed structurally. Psychological robustness is screened before ceiling projection.
04
Decision System
Mandate is explicit: Sporting Director owns final decision; Head Coach owns tactical fit; Finance owns downside limits.
No decision without a stated trade-off and risk threshold.
No decision without a stated trade-off and risk threshold.
05
Window Rhythm
Weekly decision meeting. Two deadlines: “commit date” and “walk-away date”.
No late-window escalation without pre-defined criteria.
No late-window escalation without pre-defined criteria.
Full, expanded version becomes available in-product after access — customised to your squad, model, and budget constraints.